Difference between revisions of "Meeting 13 February 2018"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''PRESENTATIONS''' [ FLUKA Simulations for absolute baseline (Parker Reid)] '''NOTES'''") |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''PRESENTATIONS''' | '''PRESENTATIONS''' | ||
− | [ FLUKA Simulations for absolute baseline (Parker Reid)] | + | [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/f/f6/CPS_Parker_Update_FEB13-2018_.pdf FLUKA Simulations for absolute baseline (Parker Reid)] |
+ | |||
+ | [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/5/54/CPS_update_2-13-2018.pdf Target rotation and irradiation (Bogdan)] | ||
'''NOTES''' | '''NOTES''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''* Action items for next meeting on Tuesday, 13 March at 3:00pm (EST):''' | ||
+ | ::* Result for backward shielding and optimization of shielding overall (Parker/Bogdan) | ||
+ | ::* Result for effect of polarized target and CPS together (Jixie) | ||
+ | ::* Outline for a 10-page document (topics/chapters/arguments to make and type of figures) and for a 1-page appendix (what would change in Hall D, e.g. floor loading etc., demonstration that the concept is doable) (Tanja/Thia) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Discussion of Parker's simulation | ||
+ | ::* In principle can use this way to determine backward shielding needs and perform overall shielding optimization: remove everything, but keep radiator, no field, so exactly what would have in hall - compare backward rate for 100uA on 2% carbon to CPS | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Discussion of what information still needed for review document | ||
+ | ::* Effect of both polarized target and CPS in Hall - Jixie's simulation has shown radiation from polarized target and CPS separately and these look ok, now need to see both together | ||
+ | ::* Backward shielding | ||
+ | ::* Optimization of shielding: why choice of specific shielding and what thickness | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Discussion about contents of the review document | ||
+ | ::* Selection of figures and text that demonstrate: 1) radiation acceptable 2) design feasible | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Discussion about an alternative polarized target moving concept that moves the beam (horizontally) instead of a mechanical structure (target stick vertical motion) for uniform irradiation |
Latest revision as of 10:26, 14 February 2018
PRESENTATIONS
FLUKA Simulations for absolute baseline (Parker Reid)
Target rotation and irradiation (Bogdan)
NOTES
* Action items for next meeting on Tuesday, 13 March at 3:00pm (EST):
- Result for backward shielding and optimization of shielding overall (Parker/Bogdan)
- Result for effect of polarized target and CPS together (Jixie)
- Outline for a 10-page document (topics/chapters/arguments to make and type of figures) and for a 1-page appendix (what would change in Hall D, e.g. floor loading etc., demonstration that the concept is doable) (Tanja/Thia)
- Discussion of Parker's simulation
- In principle can use this way to determine backward shielding needs and perform overall shielding optimization: remove everything, but keep radiator, no field, so exactly what would have in hall - compare backward rate for 100uA on 2% carbon to CPS
- Discussion of what information still needed for review document
- Effect of both polarized target and CPS in Hall - Jixie's simulation has shown radiation from polarized target and CPS separately and these look ok, now need to see both together
- Backward shielding
- Optimization of shielding: why choice of specific shielding and what thickness
- Discussion about contents of the review document
- Selection of figures and text that demonstrate: 1) radiation acceptable 2) design feasible
- Discussion about an alternative polarized target moving concept that moves the beam (horizontally) instead of a mechanical structure (target stick vertical motion) for uniform irradiation