Difference between revisions of "Meeting 16 September 2022"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Discussion items: | Discussion items: | ||
− | * Design models, stress/thermal calculations | + | * Design models, stress/thermal calculations [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/b/b8/CPS-Sep-19-2022%281%29.pptx Slides] |
* Engineering analysis and planning | * Engineering analysis and planning |
Latest revision as of 14:41, 20 September 2022
Discussion items:
- Design models, stress/thermal calculations Slides
- Engineering analysis and planning
- TCS updates
- Other
PARTICIPANTS: Amy Comer, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Brannon Semp, Donal Day, Deb Biswas, Hamlet Mkrtchyan, Hovanes Egiyan, Steven Lassiter, Marie Boer, Rolf Ent, Vardan Tadevosyan, Yeranuhi Ghandilyan, Tanja Horn
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
- PR sent out for magnet steel, coil, etc.
- Prototype
- waiting on electrical work and some monitoring and control interface development
- planning tests this fall
- Presentation on status of CPS at Hall D meeting
- will circulate draft talk for comments/feedback
FLUENT MODEL
- Model consistency checks
- coordinate systems needed to be made consistent between Bogdan/Gabriel FLUKA model and Fluent
- Working on next iteration - need to make consistent mesh with Fluent
- one approach: for each point (x,y,z) in table need power deposition - need to find points that are nearby in Fluent model representative then do interpolation
- another approach: remove all not relevant points (those that give zero results)
- Note: good to make models consistent from the start
HALL D CPS DESIGN
- Longer design (3m) with longer magnetic field (2T)
- Planning fo finish conceptual design and hold a design review in Winter 2022/23, then begin optimization
- Main person working on design: V. Baturin
FLUKA SIMULATIONS
- power deposition in copper block is complete
- scale beam power as needed - power deposition proportional to beam power
- simulations for shielding are ongoing
REMAINING DESIGN AND OTHER
- remaining shielding
- plastic
- final design absorber
- infrastructure list including moving experiment downstreams (assumed operations)
PLANS FOR TCS PROPOSAL
- In approach towards submission of a TCS proposal consider addressing PAC concerns on the experiment
- see PAC report - detailed technical concerns are listed there
- Polarized TCS science case seems good - no need to change at least not right away
- Discussion about path forward - major item: make a plan for addressing PAC concerns in coordinated way
NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY 14 OCTOBER AT 8:00AM ET