Difference between revisions of "AIOP Apr. 22, 2024"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
=== Minutes === | === Minutes === | ||
| − | + | Attendees: David L., Thomas B., Torri J., Patrick M., Jiawei G., Naomi J., Malachi S., Armen K. | |
| + | |||
| + | * (Slides from last week need to be uploaded to minutes) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Patrick showed some [[Media:2024.04.22.AIOP_moran.pdf|slides]] | ||
| + | * Jiawei showed some [[Media:2024.04.22.AIOP_guo.pdf|slides]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * First 10 days of Spring 2020 data identified nudge events comparison started | ||
| + | ** Some initial confusion on what period of time statistics produced from Patrick's and Jiawei's algorithms covered. This was sorted out and determined that they were roughly the same order of magnitude but will need to look offline to get exact numbers. | ||
| + | * Some discussion on the maximum lag between pushing a nudge button and seeing the result. This is assumed to be 10 seconds. | ||
| + | ** This is significant on how multiple nudges are combined into a single nudge event. (May be different in the two algorithms) | ||
| + | ** Naomi brought up what happens if beam goes down between pushing button and response. Patrick responded that the nudge events only end after the beam has been up for at least 30 seconds after the button was pressed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * There was some more discussion on the "c" angle as defined in Livingston's paper. | ||
| + | ** Some clarification on how AI can be used here. Specifically, AI can use recent measurements of the coherent edge and possibly other environmental factors to predict the position of the edge at a point shortly in the future. This can them be used to calculate delta-c which the standard tools can translate into changes to the goniometer angle. | ||
| + | ** Patrick asked for the values/transformations that are used to convert a change in c into changes int the yaw and pitch angles. | ||
==== Action Items ==== | ==== Action Items ==== | ||
| + | # Update last meeting's minutes with slides from Patrick and Jiawei (David) | ||
| + | # Add columns to appropriate dataframe for the edge position from start of run and from the nominal (Jiawei) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 6 May 2024
The current weekly meeting time is every other Monday at 13:00 US/Eastern
Connection Info:
You can connect using ZOOM Video conferencing (ID: 161 588 8669). (Click "Expand" to the right for details -->):
One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1602484178# or +16468287666,,1602484178#
Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
Join by Telephone
For higher quality, dial a number based on your current location.
Dial: +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)
+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)
+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)
+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)
+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)
+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)
833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
International numbers
Join from an H.323/SIP room system
H.323: 161.199.138.10 (US West)
161.199.136.10 (US East)
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
SIP: 1615888669@sip.zoomgov.com
Passcode: 561441
One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1601987443# or +16468287666,,1601987443#
Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
AIOP - Polarized Photon Source
Agenda:
- Previous Meeting
- Announcements
- Project Progress
- Data mining/preparation
- GitHub AIOP Project (AIOP-Photon issues)
- Task assignments (FTE Profiles)
- PIER Activities
- Middle School Data Science Hackathon Workshop
- HUGS mini-Workshop
- AOT
Minutes
Attendees: David L., Thomas B., Torri J., Patrick M., Jiawei G., Naomi J., Malachi S., Armen K.
- (Slides from last week need to be uploaded to minutes)
- First 10 days of Spring 2020 data identified nudge events comparison started
- Some initial confusion on what period of time statistics produced from Patrick's and Jiawei's algorithms covered. This was sorted out and determined that they were roughly the same order of magnitude but will need to look offline to get exact numbers.
- Some discussion on the maximum lag between pushing a nudge button and seeing the result. This is assumed to be 10 seconds.
- This is significant on how multiple nudges are combined into a single nudge event. (May be different in the two algorithms)
- Naomi brought up what happens if beam goes down between pushing button and response. Patrick responded that the nudge events only end after the beam has been up for at least 30 seconds after the button was pressed.
- There was some more discussion on the "c" angle as defined in Livingston's paper.
- Some clarification on how AI can be used here. Specifically, AI can use recent measurements of the coherent edge and possibly other environmental factors to predict the position of the edge at a point shortly in the future. This can them be used to calculate delta-c which the standard tools can translate into changes to the goniometer angle.
- Patrick asked for the values/transformations that are used to convert a change in c into changes int the yaw and pitch angles.
Action Items
- Update last meeting's minutes with slides from Patrick and Jiawei (David)
- Add columns to appropriate dataframe for the edge position from start of run and from the nominal (Jiawei)