Difference between revisions of "January 4th, 2017"

From kl project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Tentative Agenda:
+
Agenda [attended: Moskov, Mikhail, Mark, Justin, Volker, Avetik, Kijun, Chan, and Igor]
  
1) MC News (Mikhail, Nick)
 
  
2) Event generators (Nick, Franz)
+
1) Event generators:
  
3) n-calculations (Igor)
+
Nick: I have updated the generator with the reactions we talked about at the previous meeting. I will have more time to work on things next week when I will be back at Edinburgh. I will keep you posted with updates.
  
4) Meson spectroscopy (Volker, Lei)
+
Franz:  I modified the geant3 and geant4 geometry to include the Beryllium target (+shielding). A simple geant3 view is attached [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/a/a0/Unnamed.png]. Also I generated and ran 100k K0 p -> pi+ Lambda events but yesterday evening could not figure out why the tracking wasn't efficient (on hdview2 (event display) it looks like many hit patterns should have been reconstructed ... but I think this will be solved shortly).
  
5) etc.
+
 
 +
2) MC News
 +
 
 +
Mikhail: [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/5/5a/KL_v3a.pptx]
 +
 
 +
Justin: From the meeting today it seems that you would like a new calibration context in CCDB for the klong simulations which seems quite reasonable.  I would suggest we collect a list of settings you need specified for your simulation and then we can request these under a new context called "mc_klong".  So the two tables I'm aware of that you need modified are
 +
 
 +
rf_period = 64
 +
beam_period = 64
 +
 
 +
Simon, what magnetic field did you use in your studies [https://www.jlab.org/conferences/kl2016/talks/tuesday/taylor.pdf]?  It might be useful to try something near our nominal field like 1200 A (solenoid_1200A_poisson_20160222) and a lower field setting of maybe 800 A (solenoid_0800A_poisson_20160222).
 +
 
 +
There is a mapping in the solenoid_map table which specifies a magnetic field setting for a given run number.  So we should choose 2 different run numbers and assign these 2 field settings for them so you can generate events which will have different fields.
 +
 
 +
Simon: I did the simulations at 1300 A.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3) neutron-calculations
 +
 
 +
Igor: Situation looks tolerable [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/6/68/KL.pdf].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4) Meson spectroscopy
 +
 
 +
Volker: Next time
 +
 
 +
 
 +
5) CP violation
 +
 
 +
Moskov: Next time
 +
 
 +
 
 +
6) PAC45 is scheduled for a week of July 10, 2017.  The deadline for submission of proposals and updates is 8:00 AM EDT on Monday, May 22, 2017 [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/d/d1/PAC45_Call.pdf].

Latest revision as of 07:25, 6 January 2017

Agenda [attended: Moskov, Mikhail, Mark, Justin, Volker, Avetik, Kijun, Chan, and Igor]


1) Event generators:

Nick: I have updated the generator with the reactions we talked about at the previous meeting. I will have more time to work on things next week when I will be back at Edinburgh. I will keep you posted with updates.

Franz: I modified the geant3 and geant4 geometry to include the Beryllium target (+shielding). A simple geant3 view is attached [1]. Also I generated and ran 100k K0 p -> pi+ Lambda events but yesterday evening could not figure out why the tracking wasn't efficient (on hdview2 (event display) it looks like many hit patterns should have been reconstructed ... but I think this will be solved shortly).


2) MC News

Mikhail: [2]

Justin: From the meeting today it seems that you would like a new calibration context in CCDB for the klong simulations which seems quite reasonable. I would suggest we collect a list of settings you need specified for your simulation and then we can request these under a new context called "mc_klong". So the two tables I'm aware of that you need modified are

rf_period = 64 beam_period = 64

Simon, what magnetic field did you use in your studies [3]? It might be useful to try something near our nominal field like 1200 A (solenoid_1200A_poisson_20160222) and a lower field setting of maybe 800 A (solenoid_0800A_poisson_20160222).

There is a mapping in the solenoid_map table which specifies a magnetic field setting for a given run number. So we should choose 2 different run numbers and assign these 2 field settings for them so you can generate events which will have different fields.

Simon: I did the simulations at 1300 A.


3) neutron-calculations

Igor: Situation looks tolerable [4].


4) Meson spectroscopy

Volker: Next time


5) CP violation

Moskov: Next time


6) PAC45 is scheduled for a week of July 10, 2017. The deadline for submission of proposals and updates is 8:00 AM EDT on Monday, May 22, 2017 [5].