Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
=Discussion=
 
=Discussion=
 
* What needs to be done / checked for the publication?  
 
* What needs to be done / checked for the publication?  
**
+
** H contamination → Shape of Λ is better to be asymmetry. 
 
**
 
**
 
**
 
**
Line 26: Line 26:
 
** How to estimate  
 
** How to estimate  
 
*** the angular resolution?  
 
*** the angular resolution?  
*** QF Λ shape including the Σ
+
*** QF Λ shape including the Σ ?
  
 
=References for discussion=
 
=References for discussion=

Revision as of 07:25, 29 March 2021

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

  • 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
  • via BlueJeans

Reports

(25 + 10 min) Hampton analysis by B. Pandey

(15 + 10 min) Tohoku analysis (1) by K. Itabashi

(10 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by S. Nagao

(25 + 10 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki

  • Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
    • Angle resolution
    • Missing mass resolution
  • Systematic error on BΛ
  • Cross section analysis

Discussion

  • What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
    • H contamination → Shape of Λ is better to be asymmetry.
  • Questions
    • How to estimate
      • the angular resolution?
      • QF Λ shape including the Σ ?

References for discussion