Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==(15 + 10 min) Tohoku analysis (1) by K. Itabashi==
 
==(15 + 10 min) Tohoku analysis (1) by K. Itabashi==
 
==(10 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by S. Nagao==
 
==(10 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by S. Nagao==
 +
[https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/nagao20210331_JLab_analysis_meeting.pdf PDF ]
 +
*
 
==(25 + 10 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki==
 
==(25 + 10 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki==
 
* Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
 
* Resolution study by Geant4 simulation

Revision as of 05:43, 31 March 2021

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

  • 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
  • via BlueJeans

Reports

(25 + 10 min) Hampton analysis by B. Pandey

(15 + 10 min) Tohoku analysis (1) by K. Itabashi

(10 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by S. Nagao

PDF

(25 + 10 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki

  • Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
    • Angle resolution
    • Missing mass resolution
  • Systematic error on BΛ
  • Cross section analysis

Discussion

  • What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
    • H contamination → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region.
  • Questions to Hampton group
    • How to estimate
      • the angular resolution?
      • QF Λ shape including the Σ ?

References for discussion