Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=Reports= | =Reports= | ||
| − | ==(10 min) | + | ==Hampton== |
| − | ==(20 min) | + | ===(10 min) Summary by L. Tang=== |
| − | ==(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami== | + | ===(20 min) Details by B. Pandey=== |
| − | ==(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki== | + | ==Kyoto== |
| + | ===(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami=== | ||
| + | ===(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki=== | ||
* Resolution study by Geant4 simulation | * Resolution study by Geant4 simulation | ||
** Angle resolution | ** Angle resolution | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
* Systematic error on B<sub>Λ</sub> | * Systematic error on B<sub>Λ</sub> | ||
* Cross section analysis | * Cross section analysis | ||
| − | ==(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao== | + | ==Tohoku== |
| + | ===(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao=== | ||
[https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/nagao20210331_JLab_analysis_meeting.pdf PDF ] | [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/nagao20210331_JLab_analysis_meeting.pdf PDF ] | ||
* | * | ||
| − | ==(20 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by K. Itabashi== | + | ===(20 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by K. Itabashi=== |
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
Revision as of 05:50, 31 March 2021
nnΛ Analysis Meeting
Information
- 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
- Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
- via BlueJeans
Reports
Hampton
(10 min) Summary by L. Tang
(20 min) Details by B. Pandey
Kyoto
(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami
(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki
- Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
- Angle resolution
- Missing mass resolution
- Systematic error on BΛ
- Cross section analysis
Tohoku
(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao
(20 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by K. Itabashi
Discussion
- What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
- H contamination → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region.
- Questions to Hampton group
- How to estimate
- the angular resolution?
- QF Λ shape including the Σ ?
- How to estimate
References for discussion
- from Hampton
- from Tohoku
- from Kyoto
- Mar 24, 2021: Simple test of matrix tuning by using simulated data: JLabMeeting_20210324_gogami.pdf
- June 18, 2020: Missing mass spectra: JLabMeeting_20200618_gogami.pdf
- May 01, 2020: Angle resolution (Summary of Suzuki’s study): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200501_gogami.pdf
- Apr 24, 2020: Comments on the missing mass resolution： JLabMeeting_20200424_gogami.pdf
- Apr 21, 2020: Missing mass resolution (Fake peak study by Itabashi is found in the last part): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200421_gogami.pdf
- Apr 16, 2020: How to treat angle resolution for the intrinsic resolution estimation (here, the worse resolution for angle is used compared to the recent values though)： JLabMeeting_20200416_gogami.pdf
- Mar 13, 2020: The expected resolution, the number of events, items to be reexamined (p. 31, 32): JLabMeeting_20200313_gogami.pdf