Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
**
 
**
 
*Kyoto
 
*Kyoto
**
+
**Angle resolution (Summary of Suzuki’s study) [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/nnL_AnalysisNote_20200501_gogami.pdf]
**
+
**Missing mass resolution (Fake peak study by Itabashi is found in the last part): [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/nnL_AnalysisNote_20200421_gogami.pdf]
 +
**Comments on the missing mass resolution: [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/JLabMeeting_20200424_gogami.pdf]
 +
**How to treat angle resolution for the intrinsic resolution estimation (here, the worse resolution for angle is used compared to the recent values though): [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/JLabMeeting_20200416_gogami.pdf]
 +
**The expected resolution, the number of events, items to be reexamined (p. 31, 32): [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/JLabMeeting_20200313_gogami.pdf]

Revision as of 07:21, 26 March 2021

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

  • 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants:
  • via BlueJeans

Reports

(25 + 10 min) Hampton analysis by B. Pandey

(15 + 10 min) Tohoku analysis (1) by K. Itabashi

(10 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by S. Nagao

(25 + 10 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki

  • Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
    • Angle resolution
    • Missing mass resolution
  • Systematic error on BΛ
  • Cross section analysis

Discussion

  • What needs to be done / checked for the publication?

References for discussion

  • Hampton
  • Tohoku
  • Kyoto
    • Angle resolution (Summary of Suzuki’s study) [1]
    • Missing mass resolution (Fake peak study by Itabashi is found in the last part): [2]
    • Comments on the missing mass resolution: [3]
    • How to treat angle resolution for the intrinsic resolution estimation (here, the worse resolution for angle is used compared to the recent values though): [4]
    • The expected resolution, the number of events, items to be reexamined (p. 31, 32): [5]