Difference between revisions of "October 1st, 2024"

From kl project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GFPgQ0YyD6vYy7_Xw8KcNHSIaXiqJqL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102465777344247357279&rtpof=true&sd=true KLF Software Task List].
 
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GFPgQ0YyD6vYy7_Xw8KcNHSIaXiqJqL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102465777344247357279&rtpof=true&sd=true KLF Software Task List].
  
-- [[media:talk_klf_k0_prod_ech.pdf | Simulation of KL flux using PYTHIA by ''Eugene'']].
+
-- [[media:talk_klf_k0_prod_ech.pdf | Simulation of KL flux using PYTHIA by ''Eugene'']].  
  
-- [[media:Klflux.pdf | SLAC KL yield from Be target by ''Moskov's'' slide from SLAC-PUB-1084 (TH) and (EXP) August 1972 and Phys Rev. D 7, 708 (1973)]].
+
-- ''Eugene'' updated the slides:
  
-- [[media: | ''Vitaly's'' slides]].
+
--1) the W/Cu ratio in the plug was changed to 90/10. With that, about 5% of the plug volume appears to be empty. It would effectively increase the absorption length of the plug material by ~3%.
 +
 
 +
-- 2) ''Eugene'' noticed that the absorption length in pure W is rather 6.8 cm than 7.0 cm I used before. This would decrease the absorption length of the plug.
 +
 
 +
-- This resulted in no significant change in the absorption length of the plug. It is still 7.8 cm (using the same method). An additional 5cm plug would kill about 50% of KLs. At this time I am not sure what the uncertainty of the evaluated absorption length is. It needs further studies.
 +
 
 +
-- [[media:Klflux.pdf | SLAC KL yield from Be target by ''Moskov's'' slide from SLAC-PUB-1084, August 1972 and Phys Rev. D 7, 708 (1973)]].
 +
 
 +
-- [[media:KLFSOFTmeeting100124.pdf | ''Vitaly's'' slides for KL + p --> KL + p reconstruction]].
 +
 
 +
-- [[media:Scott_klf_study_kl4_10012024.pdf | ''Marshall's'' slides for KL + p --> Lambda + pi+; Marshall was absent at the meeting, but uploaded slides later]].
  
 
* AOB
 
* AOB

Latest revision as of 11:10, 1 October 2024

Attended: Sean, Eugene, Vitaly, Hovanes, Sashi, Richard, Keigo, Mikhail, Alex, Stuart, Moskov, and Igor.

  • Announcements

- Igor reported that the PWA groups BnGa (Andrey) is waiting for our contribution for Xi study (Stuart) and JuBoWa (Deborah) for for our contribution for Lambda study (Marshall).

- Mikhail reported about new activity with REKEN (Kenta Itahashi) group to sudy Lamba p --> Lambda p.

-- Simulation of KL flux using PYTHIA by Eugene.

-- Eugene updated the slides:

--1) the W/Cu ratio in the plug was changed to 90/10. With that, about 5% of the plug volume appears to be empty. It would effectively increase the absorption length of the plug material by ~3%.

-- 2) Eugene noticed that the absorption length in pure W is rather 6.8 cm than 7.0 cm I used before. This would decrease the absorption length of the plug.

-- This resulted in no significant change in the absorption length of the plug. It is still 7.8 cm (using the same method). An additional 5cm plug would kill about 50% of KLs. At this time I am not sure what the uncertainty of the evaluated absorption length is. It needs further studies.

-- SLAC KL yield from Be target by Moskov's slide from SLAC-PUB-1084, August 1972 and Phys Rev. D 7, 708 (1973).

-- Vitaly's slides for KL + p --> KL + p reconstruction.

-- Marshall's slides for KL + p --> Lambda + pi+; Marshall was absent at the meeting, but uploaded slides later.

  • AOB