Difference between revisions of "October 1st, 2024"
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GFPgQ0YyD6vYy7_Xw8KcNHSIaXiqJqL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102465777344247357279&rtpof=true&sd=true KLF Software Task List]. | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GFPgQ0YyD6vYy7_Xw8KcNHSIaXiqJqL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102465777344247357279&rtpof=true&sd=true KLF Software Task List]. | ||
| − | -- [[media:talk_klf_k0_prod_ech.pdf | Simulation of KL flux using PYTHIA by ''Eugene'']]. | + | -- [[media:talk_klf_k0_prod_ech.pdf | Simulation of KL flux using PYTHIA by ''Eugene'']]. |
| + | |||
| + | -- ''Eugene'' updated the slides: | ||
| + | |||
| + | --1) the W/Cu ratio in the plug was changed to 90/10. With that, about 5% of the plug volume appears to be empty. It would effectively increase the absorption length of the plug material by ~3%. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -- 2) ''Eugene'' noticed that the absorption length in pure W is rather 6.8 cm than 7.0 cm I used before. This would decrease the absorption length of the plug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -- This resulted in no significant change in the absorption length of the plug. It is still 7.8 cm (using the same method). An additional 5cm plug would kill about 50% of KLs. At this time I am not sure what the uncertainty of the evaluated absorption length is. It needs further studies. | ||
-- [[media:Klflux.pdf | SLAC KL yield from Be target by ''Moskov's'' slide from SLAC-PUB-1084, August 1972 and Phys Rev. D 7, 708 (1973)]]. | -- [[media:Klflux.pdf | SLAC KL yield from Be target by ''Moskov's'' slide from SLAC-PUB-1084, August 1972 and Phys Rev. D 7, 708 (1973)]]. | ||
| − | -- [[media: | ''Vitaly's'' slides]]. | + | -- [[media:KLFSOFTmeeting100124.pdf | ''Vitaly's'' slides for KL + p --> KL + p reconstruction]]. |
| + | |||
| + | -- [[media:Scott_klf_study_kl4_10012024.pdf | ''Marshall's'' slides for KL + p --> Lambda + pi+; Marshall was absent at the meeting, but uploaded slides later]]. | ||
* AOB | * AOB | ||
Latest revision as of 10:10, 1 October 2024
Attended: Sean, Eugene, Vitaly, Hovanes, Sashi, Richard, Keigo, Mikhail, Alex, Stuart, Moskov, and Igor.
- Announcements
- Igor reported that the PWA groups BnGa (Andrey) is waiting for our contribution for Xi study (Stuart) and JuBoWa (Deborah) for for our contribution for Lambda study (Marshall).
- Mikhail reported about new activity with REKEN (Kenta Itahashi) group to sudy Lamba p --> Lambda p.
-- Simulation of KL flux using PYTHIA by Eugene.
-- Eugene updated the slides:
--1) the W/Cu ratio in the plug was changed to 90/10. With that, about 5% of the plug volume appears to be empty. It would effectively increase the absorption length of the plug material by ~3%.
-- 2) Eugene noticed that the absorption length in pure W is rather 6.8 cm than 7.0 cm I used before. This would decrease the absorption length of the plug.
-- This resulted in no significant change in the absorption length of the plug. It is still 7.8 cm (using the same method). An additional 5cm plug would kill about 50% of KLs. At this time I am not sure what the uncertainty of the evaluated absorption length is. It needs further studies.
-- Vitaly's slides for KL + p --> KL + p reconstruction.
- AOB