Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Kyoto== | ==Kyoto== | ||
===(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami=== | ===(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami=== | ||
| − | <font size="4">[[Media:JLabMeeting 20210331 gogami.pdf| | + | <font size="4">[[Media:JLabMeeting 20210331 gogami.pdf|JLabMeeting_20210331_gogami.pdf]]</font> |
===(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki=== | ===(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki=== | ||
Revision as of 05:57, 31 March 2021
nnΛ Analysis Meeting
Information
- 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
- Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
- via BlueJeans
Reports
Hampton
(10 min) Summary by L. Tang
(20 min) Details by B. Pandey
Kyoto
(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami
JLabMeeting_20210331_gogami.pdf
(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki
- Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
- Angle resolution
- Missing mass resolution
- Systematic error on BΛ
- Cross section analysis
Tohoku
(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao
- The intrinsic mass resolution
- Tuning with Al data
(20 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by K. Itabashi
Discussion
- What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
- H contamination → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region.
- Questions to Hampton group
- How to estimate
- the angular resolutions (Δ x' and &Delta y')?
- QF Λ shape including the Σ ?
- the differential cross sections and their errors (acceptance correction etc.)?
- How to estimate
References for discussion
- from Hampton
- from Tohoku
- from Kyoto
- Mar 24, 2021: Simple test of matrix tuning by using simulated data: JLabMeeting_20210324_gogami.pdf
- June 18, 2020: Missing mass spectra: JLabMeeting_20200618_gogami.pdf
- May 01, 2020: Angle resolution (Summary of Suzuki’s study): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200501_gogami.pdf
- Apr 24, 2020: Comments on the missing mass resolution： JLabMeeting_20200424_gogami.pdf
- Apr 21, 2020: Missing mass resolution (Fake peak study by Itabashi is found in the last part): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200421_gogami.pdf
- Apr 16, 2020: How to treat angle resolution for the intrinsic resolution estimation (here, the worse resolution for angle is used compared to the recent values though)： JLabMeeting_20200416_gogami.pdf
- Mar 13, 2020: The expected resolution, the number of events, items to be reexamined (p. 31, 32): JLabMeeting_20200313_gogami.pdf