Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
=References for discussion= | =References for discussion= | ||
*from Hampton | *from Hampton | ||
| − | ** | + | ** [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/TECHNIQUE_OF_MATRIX_TUNE_Tang2021Mar.pdf TECHNIQUE_OF_MATRIX_TUNE_Tang2021Mar.pdf] |
| − | ** | + | ** [https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gogami/e12-17-003/meeting/analysis/src/Resolution_optical_tune_Tang2021Mar.pdf Resolution_optical_tune_Tang2021Mar.pdf] |
*from Tohoku | *from Tohoku | ||
** | ** | ||
Revision as of 06:05, 31 March 2021
nnΛ Analysis Meeting
Information
- 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
- Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
- via BlueJeans
Reports
Hampton
(10 min) Summary by L. Tang
(20 min) Details by B. Pandey
Kyoto
(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami
Presentation file = JLabMeeting_20210331_gogami.pdf
- Expected mass resolution
- Momentum tuning with Λ(H), Σ(H), and Λ(T)
- Cross section
(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki
- Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
- Angle resolution
- Missing mass resolution
- Systematic error on BΛ
- Cross section analysis
Tohoku
(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao
Presentation file = nagao20210331_JLab_analysis_meeting.pdf
- The intrinsic mass resolution
- Tuning with Al data
(20 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by K. Itabashi
Discussion
- What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
- H contamination → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region.
- Questions to Hampton group
- How to estimate
- the angular resolutions (Δ x' and &Delta y')?
- QF Λ shape including the Σ ?
- the differential cross sections and their errors (acceptance correction etc.)?
- How to estimate
References for discussion
- from Hampton
- from Tohoku
- from Kyoto
- Mar 24, 2021: Simple test of matrix tuning by using simulated data: JLabMeeting_20210324_gogami.pdf
- June 18, 2020: Missing mass spectra: JLabMeeting_20200618_gogami.pdf
- May 01, 2020: Angle resolution (Summary of Suzuki’s study): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200501_gogami.pdf
- Apr 24, 2020: Comments on the missing mass resolution： JLabMeeting_20200424_gogami.pdf
- Apr 21, 2020: Missing mass resolution (Fake peak study by Itabashi is found in the last part): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200421_gogami.pdf
- Apr 16, 2020: How to treat angle resolution for the intrinsic resolution estimation (here, the worse resolution for angle is used compared to the recent values though)： JLabMeeting_20200416_gogami.pdf
- Mar 13, 2020: The expected resolution, the number of events, items to be reexamined (p. 31, 32): JLabMeeting_20200313_gogami.pdf