Revision as of 08:26, 31 March 2021

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
via BlueJeans

Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
- Angle resolution
- Missing mass resolution
Systematic error on B_Λ
Cross section analysis

What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
- H contamination → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region.

Questions to Hampton group
- How to estimate
  - the angular resolutions (Δ x' and &Delta y')?
  - QF Λ shape including the Σ ?
  - the differential cross sections and their errors (acceptance correction etc.)?

from Hampton
- TECHNIQUE_OF_MATRIX_TUNE_Tang2021Mar.pdf (Mar 15, 2021)
- Resolution_optical_tune_Tang2021Mar.pdf (Mar 15, 2021)
from Tohoku
from Kyoto
- Mar 24, 2021: Simple test of matrix tuning by using simulated data: JLabMeeting_20210324_gogami.pdf
- June 18, 2020: Missing mass spectra: JLabMeeting_20200618_gogami.pdf
- May 01, 2020: Angle resolution (Summary of Suzuki’s study): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200501_gogami.pdf
- Apr 24, 2020: Comments on the missing mass resolution： JLabMeeting_20200424_gogami.pdf
- Apr 21, 2020: Missing mass resolution (Fake peak study by Itabashi is found in the last part): nnL_AnalysisNote_20200421_gogami.pdf
- Apr 16, 2020: How to treat angle resolution for the intrinsic resolution estimation (here, the worse resolution for angle is used compared to the recent values though)： JLabMeeting_20200416_gogami.pdf
- Mar 13, 2020: The expected resolution, the number of events, items to be reexamined (p. 31, 32): JLabMeeting_20200313_gogami.pdf

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Hampton==
 ===(10 min) Summary by L. Tang===
+* Matrix tuning
+* The intrinsic mass resolution
 ===(20 + 10 min) Details by B. Pandey===
 ==Kyoto==