Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20211119"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Info) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
=Next Meeting= | =Next Meeting= | ||
− | * 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST<br> (7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021) | + | * 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST<br> (7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST) |
<br> | <br> | ||
----- | ----- | ||
<font size="4"> [[HYP_HRS-HKS|Back to Home (HRS-HKS)]]</font> | <font size="4"> [[HYP_HRS-HKS|Back to Home (HRS-HKS)]]</font> |
Revision as of 03:43, 20 November 2021
Info
- 22:00-23:30 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
- Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.)
- via BlueJeans
Discussion
nnΛ analysis (Bishnu)
- Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ
- Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
- Decay width
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
by square root of square sum. However, the decay width usually is not based on a simple Gaus.
Therefore, the simple square root of square sum seems to be not a good assumption.
→ c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed.
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
Next Meeting
- 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST
(7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST)