Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20211119"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Info) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Info= | =Info= | ||
− | * 22:00-23: | + | * 22:00-23:10 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST) |
* Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.) | * Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.) | ||
* via BlueJeans | * via BlueJeans |
Revision as of 03:44, 20 November 2021
Info
- 22:00-23:10 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
- Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.)
- via BlueJeans
Discussion
nnΛ analysis (Bishnu)
- Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ
- Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
- Decay width
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
by square root of square sum. However, the decay width usually is not based on a simple Gaus.
Therefore, the simple square root of square sum seems to be not a good assumption.
→ c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed.
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
Next Meeting
- 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST
(7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST)