Difference between revisions of "HYP Pb-exp 20220525"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* S/N seems to be not so good for Pb even at I = 20 uA (based on Sho's estimation). <br> The beam current needs to be optimized. | * S/N seems to be not so good for Pb even at I = 20 uA (based on Sho's estimation). <br> The beam current needs to be optimized. | ||
* Independent simulation will be done by Guido. <br> → will be shown in the next (or next-next) strategy meeting. | * Independent simulation will be done by Guido. <br> → will be shown in the next (or next-next) strategy meeting. | ||
| − | * Hall C & | + | * Hall C &arr; confirmed. |
Revision as of 05:55, 25 May 2022
Pb target experiment (E12-20-013)
Info
- 18:00- (11:00- in Rome) May 25, 2022 JST
- Franco, Guido, Nue, Sho, Gogami
- zoom
Discussion
- About beam current to be used for Pb (Guido, Sho)
- S/N and Yield check
- SpreadSheet for the rate (S/N) estimation (made by Sho):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18GEnIWgMTDtWNbbDInGvp9WjeGrG-XeFp1jVcL0nBys/edit#gid=1373519431
Summary
- S/N seems to be not so good for Pb even at I = 20 uA (based on Sho's estimation).
The beam current needs to be optimized. - Independent simulation will be done by Guido.
→ will be shown in the next (or next-next) strategy meeting. - Hall C &arr; confirmed.