Difference between revisions of "HYP Pb-exp 20220525"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* About beam current to be used for Pb (Guido, Sho)
 
* About beam current to be used for Pb (Guido, Sho)
 
** S/N and Yield check
 
** S/N and Yield check
** SpreadSheet made by Sho: <br> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18GEnIWgMTDtWNbbDInGvp9WjeGrG-XeFp1jVcL0nBys/edit#gid=1373519431
+
** SpreadSheet for the rate (S/N) estimation (made by Sho): <br> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18GEnIWgMTDtWNbbDInGvp9WjeGrG-XeFp1jVcL0nBys/edit#gid=1373519431
 +
 
 +
==Summary==
 +
* S/N seems to be not so good for Pb even at I = 20 uA (based on Sho's estimation). <br> The beam current needs to be optimized.
 +
* Independent simulation will be done by Guido. <br> &rarr; will be shown in the next (or next-next) strategy meeting.
 +
* Hall C &larr; confirmed.
  
  

Latest revision as of 05:55, 25 May 2022

Pb target experiment (E12-20-013)

Info

  • 18:00- (11:00- in Rome) May 25, 2022 JST
  • Franco, Guido, Nue, Sho, Gogami
  • zoom

Discussion

Summary

  • S/N seems to be not so good for Pb even at I = 20 uA (based on Sho's estimation).
    The beam current needs to be optimized.
  • Independent simulation will be done by Guido.
    → will be shown in the next (or next-next) strategy meeting.
  • Hall C ← confirmed.




Back to Home