Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210331"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Kyoto==
 
==Kyoto==
 
===(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami===
 
===(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami===
 +
<font size="5">[[Media:JLabMeeting 20210331 gogami.pdf|PDF]]</size>
 
===(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki===
 
===(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki===
 
* Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
 
* Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
Line 18: Line 19:
 
* Systematic error on B<sub>&Lambda;</sub>
 
* Systematic error on B<sub>&Lambda;</sub>
 
* Cross section analysis
 
* Cross section analysis
 +
 
==Tohoku==
 
==Tohoku==
 
===(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao===
 
===(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao===

Revision as of 05:56, 31 March 2021

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

  • 21:00- March 31, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Franco, Guido, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, Nathaniel
  • via BlueJeans

Reports

Hampton

(10 min) Summary by L. Tang

(20 min) Details by B. Pandey

Kyoto

(5 min) Japanese Analysis Summary by T. Gogami

PDF</size>

(25 min) Kyoto analysis by K.N. Suzuki

  • Resolution study by Geant4 simulation
    • Angle resolution
    • Missing mass resolution
  • Systematic error on BΛ
  • Cross section analysis

Tohoku

(10 min)Tohoku analysis (1) by S. Nagao

PDF

  • The intrinsic mass resolution
  • Tuning with Al data

(20 min) Tohoku analysis (2) by K. Itabashi

Discussion

  • What needs to be done / checked for the publication?
    • H contamination → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region.
  • Questions to Hampton group
    • How to estimate
      • the angular resolutions (Δ x' and &Delta y')?
      • QF Λ shape including the Σ ?
      • the differential cross sections and their errors (acceptance correction etc.)?

References for discussion