Difference between revisions of "Analysis Meeting: January 17th, 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Discussion) |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
'''S0''' | '''S0''' | ||
-there wasn't an acceptance issue for GMp | -there wasn't an acceptance issue for GMp | ||
− | -will the S0 frame generate too many pions? (for Marathon) | + | -will the S0 frame generate too many knocked-out electrons from pions that can create electron-like triggers? (for Marathon) |
-need to look at DVCS data to see if there will be an issue for pion-rejection in Marathon | -need to look at DVCS data to see if there will be an issue for pion-rejection in Marathon |
Latest revision as of 22:45, 17 January 2017
Back to Main Page >> Analysis Meetings >> Pre-experiment
Instructions
Agenda
- Example (slides)
Attendance
Onsite: Phone:
Discussion
Discussion with Zhihong's slides
- Raster
-Doug will get an update from Bill Gunning -follow up with possible updates/repair to prevent frequent accesses during tritium running
- HRS
HRS momentum limitations -priorities for Jack's time from now until running -get update from Jack on current status/limitations on HRS magnets -Tentative Priorities: 1-stability of LHRS at high-momentum, 2-raise RHRS momentum limit
Cooling Co-dependence, tripping HRS magnets -for tritium running will cooling systems be pushed to the limit? (3-4 hall running?)
- DAQ
-need to decide on final trigger settings for (e'p). (argon will use same trigger) -students should get familiar with installed electronics, cable maps, etc. -John will send out (e'p) trigger proposal next week -parallel NIM and MLU trigger decisions, both sent to TS
- Scintillator
S0 -there wasn't an acceptance issue for GMp -will the S0 frame generate too many knocked-out electrons from pions that can create electron-like triggers? (for Marathon) -need to look at DVCS data to see if there will be an issue for pion-rejection in Marathon