Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20211119"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Info= * 22:00-23:30 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST) * Bishnu (Hampton), Toshi (Kyoto) * via BlueJeans =Discussion= ==nnΛ data (Bishnu)== * Statistical significance when he chan...") |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
==nnΛ data (Bishnu)== | ==nnΛ data (Bishnu)== | ||
| − | * Statistical significance when he changed the integral region. | + | * Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ |
| + | ** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region. | ||
* Decay width | * Decay width | ||
** The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, the decay width usually is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum seems to be not a good assumption. <br> → c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed. | ** The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, the decay width usually is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum seems to be not a good assumption. <br> → c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed. | ||
Revision as of 03:41, 20 November 2021
Info
- 22:00-23:30 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
- Bishnu (Hampton), Toshi (Kyoto)
- via BlueJeans
Discussion
nnΛ data (Bishnu)
- Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ
- Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
- Decay width
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
by square root of square sum. However, the decay width usually is not based on a simple Gaus.
Therefore, the simple square root of square sum seems to be not a good assumption.
→ c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed.
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated