Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20211119"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region. | ** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region. | ||
* Decay width | * Decay width | ||
| − | ** The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption. <br> → c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed. | + | ** The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption. <br> → c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width. |
=Next Meeting= | =Next Meeting= | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 20 November 2021
Info
- 22:00-23:10 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
- Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.)
- via BlueJeans
Discussion
nnΛ analysis (Bishnu)
- Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ
- Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
- Decay width
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus.
Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption.
→ c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width.
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
Next Meeting
- 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST
(7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST)