Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20211119"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Info) |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Info= | =Info= | ||
| − | * 22:00-23: | + | * 22:00-23:10 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST) |
* Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.) | * Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.) | ||
* via BlueJeans | * via BlueJeans | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region. | ** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region. | ||
* Decay width | * Decay width | ||
| − | ** The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, the decay width | + | ** The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption. <br> → <font color="green">c.f.)</font> In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width.<br> In addition, the experimental response function was not the Gaus function, neither in the Suzuki's analysis. |
| − | + | * Radiation tail | |
| + | ** It appears on the larger mass region. | ||
=Next Meeting= | =Next Meeting= | ||
| − | * 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST<br> (7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021) | + | * 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST<br> (7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST) |
<br> | <br> | ||
----- | ----- | ||
<font size="4"> [[HYP_HRS-HKS|Back to Home (HRS-HKS)]]</font> | <font size="4"> [[HYP_HRS-HKS|Back to Home (HRS-HKS)]]</font> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:51, 20 November 2021
Info
- 22:00-23:10 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
- Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.)
- via BlueJeans
Discussion
nnΛ analysis (Bishnu)
- Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ
- Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
- Decay width
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus.
Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption.
→ c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width.
In addition, the experimental response function was not the Gaus function, neither in the Suzuki's analysis.
- The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
- Radiation tail
- It appears on the larger mass region.
Next Meeting
- 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST
(7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST)