Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20211119"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
 
** Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
 
* Decay width
 
* Decay width
** The decay width (&Gamma;/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption. <br> &rarr; c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width.<br> In addition, the experimental response function was not the Gaus function, neither in the Suzuki's analysis.  
+
** The decay width (&Gamma;/2) and the experimental response function may be treated<br> by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus. <br> Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption. <br> &rarr; <font color="green">c.f.)</font> In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width.<br> In addition, the experimental response function was not the Gaus function, neither in the Suzuki's analysis.  
 
* Radiation tail
 
* Radiation tail
 
** It appears on the larger mass region.
 
** It appears on the larger mass region.

Latest revision as of 03:51, 20 November 2021

Info

  • 22:00-23:10 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
  • Bishnu (Hampton Univ.), Toshi (Kyoto Univ.)
  • via BlueJeans

Discussion

nnΛ analysis (Bishnu)

  • Events around the thresholds of nnΛ and nnΣ
    • Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
  • Decay width
    • The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
      by square root of square sum. However, generally the decay width is not based on a simple Gaus.
      Therefore, the simple square root of square sum does not seem to be a good assumption.
      c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed for the decay width.
      In addition, the experimental response function was not the Gaus function, neither in the Suzuki's analysis.
  • Radiation tail
    • It appears on the larger mass region.

Next Meeting

  • 9:00 a.m. - on Nov 29, 2021, JST
    (7:00 p.m.- on Nov 28, 2021, EST)



Back to Home (HRS-HKS)