NnL analysis 20211119

From Tritium Experiments Group
Revision as of 03:40, 20 November 2021 by Gogami (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Info= * 22:00-23:30 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST) * Bishnu (Hampton), Toshi (Kyoto) * via BlueJeans =Discussion= ==nnΛ data (Bishnu)== * Statistical significance when he chan...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Info

  • 22:00-23:30 on Nov 19, 2021 (JST)
  • Bishnu (Hampton), Toshi (Kyoto)
  • via BlueJeans

Discussion

nnΛ data (Bishnu)

  • Statistical significance when he changed the integral region.
  • Decay width
    • The decay width (Γ/2) and the experimental response function may be treated
      by square root of square sum. However, the decay width usually is not based on a simple Gaus.
      Therefore, the simple square root of square sum seems to be not a good assumption.
      → c.f.) In the case of Suzuki's analysis, Bright Wigner function was assumed.



Back to Home (HRS-HKS)