Difference between revisions of "2018 Mott Paper Working Area"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Paper Plots== | ==Paper Plots== | ||
*'''Plots Still Needed''' | *'''Plots Still Needed''' | ||
| + | : Request #2. We measured dependence of the physics asymmetry on the position of the beam on the target foil from two target foils: 0.225um and 1um. For each foil we measured 7 asymmetries (one at center and six others away from center). The details are described in the systematics TN on the wiki. He'd like a plot showing the measured physics asymmetries (weighted average of IN/OUT) vs. radial distance from the center (instead of using x/y values shown in the TN), and then the average with it's uncertainty band, for the two target foils. | ||
::*Asymmetry vs Beam Position from Nominal (radially) | ::*Asymmetry vs Beam Position from Nominal (radially) | ||
| − | : | + | |
| + | : Request #3 - Recreate Michael's Paper's Plot | ||
::** Remaking of Figure 6: [[media:Au_targetMSteigerwald.gif]]. The lines are a fit ( asym = a / (1.0 + alpha . d) ). On the original figure, the lines were his calculations. | ::** Remaking of Figure 6: [[media:Au_targetMSteigerwald.gif]]. The lines are a fit ( asym = a / (1.0 + alpha . d) ). On the original figure, the lines were his calculations. | ||
*'''Asymmetry vs Deadtime/Beam Current''' | *'''Asymmetry vs Deadtime/Beam Current''' | ||
| + | : Request #1. We measured dependence of electronic dead time on the beam current at five different average beam currents from 0.245-4.1 uA on a 1um foil. He'd like a plot showing the five data points vs. beam current with their individual uncertainties, and then the average with it's uncertainty band. | ||
| + | |||
::[[media:Deadtime vs beamcurrent.ods]] | ::[[media:Deadtime vs beamcurrent.ods]] | ||
::[[File:Asym v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ::[[File:Asym v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ||
::[[File:Avg asym v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ::[[File:Avg asym v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ||
::[[File:Avg deadtime v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ::[[File:Avg deadtime v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ||
Revision as of 08:54, 2 November 2018
General Links/Documents
- Back to Mott Homepage CEBAF_MeV_Mott_Polarimeter
- Up-to-date Tech Notes, Paper Articles, etc. : Archived Documents
- Most recent draft of Phys. Rev. C Paper : File:PhysRevCPaper placeholder.pdf
- Run 1
- Online Analysis Spreadsheet : media:run1database.ods
- Asymmetry vs Foil Thickness Full Analysis Spreadsheet : media:06.01.17_Run1_ARC+Dilution.ods
- Run 2
- Online Analysis Spreadsheet : Media:Run2RawData.ods
- Asymmetry vs Foil Thickness Full Analysis Spreadsheet : media:06.01.17_Run2_ARC+Dilution.ods
Paper Section Drafts
Paper Plots
- Plots Still Needed
- Request #2. We measured dependence of the physics asymmetry on the position of the beam on the target foil from two target foils: 0.225um and 1um. For each foil we measured 7 asymmetries (one at center and six others away from center). The details are described in the systematics TN on the wiki. He'd like a plot showing the measured physics asymmetries (weighted average of IN/OUT) vs. radial distance from the center (instead of using x/y values shown in the TN), and then the average with it's uncertainty band, for the two target foils.
- Asymmetry vs Beam Position from Nominal (radially)
- Request #3 - Recreate Michael's Paper's Plot
- Remaking of Figure 6: media:Au_targetMSteigerwald.gif. The lines are a fit ( asym = a / (1.0 + alpha . d) ). On the original figure, the lines were his calculations.
- Asymmetry vs Deadtime/Beam Current
- Request #1. We measured dependence of electronic dead time on the beam current at five different average beam currents from 0.245-4.1 uA on a 1um foil. He'd like a plot showing the five data points vs. beam current with their individual uncertainties, and then the average with it's uncertainty band.
