Difference between revisions of "2018 Mott Paper Working Area"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Draft Punchlist== | ==Draft Punchlist== | ||
| − | === Request #1 === | + | === Request #1 -- First Draft Below === |
We measured dependence of electronic dead time on the beam current at five different average beam currents from 0.245-4.1 uA on a 1um foil. He'd like a plot showing the five data points vs. beam current with their individual uncertainties, and then the average with it's uncertainty band. | We measured dependence of electronic dead time on the beam current at five different average beam currents from 0.245-4.1 uA on a 1um foil. He'd like a plot showing the five data points vs. beam current with their individual uncertainties, and then the average with it's uncertainty band. | ||
| + | ::[[File::ROOT_deadtime_asym_v_beamcurrent.gif|600px]] | ||
::[[media:Deadtime vs beamcurrent.ods]] | ::[[media:Deadtime vs beamcurrent.ods]] | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
::[[File:Avg deadtime v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ::[[File:Avg deadtime v beamcurrent.gif||600px]] | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 4 November 2018
General Links/Documents
- Back to Mott Homepage CEBAF_MeV_Mott_Polarimeter
- Up-to-date Tech Notes, Paper Articles, etc. : Archived Documents
- Most recent draft of Phys. Rev. C Paper : File:PhysRevCPaper placeholder.pdf
- Run 1
- Online Analysis Spreadsheet : media:run1database.ods
- Asymmetry vs Foil Thickness Full Analysis Spreadsheet : media:06.01.17_Run1_ARC+Dilution.ods
- Run 2
- Online Analysis Spreadsheet : Media:Run2RawData.ods
- Asymmetry vs Foil Thickness Full Analysis Spreadsheet : media:06.01.17_Run2_ARC+Dilution.ods
Draft Punchlist
Request #1 -- First Draft Below
We measured dependence of electronic dead time on the beam current at five different average beam currents from 0.245-4.1 uA on a 1um foil. He'd like a plot showing the five data points vs. beam current with their individual uncertainties, and then the average with it's uncertainty band.
- [[File::ROOT_deadtime_asym_v_beamcurrent.gif|600px]]
Request #2
We measured dependence of the physics asymmetry on the position of the beam on the target foil from two target foils: 0.225um and 1um. For each foil we measured 7 asymmetries (one at center and six others away from center). The details are described in the systematics TN on the wiki. He'd like a plot showing the measured physics asymmetries (weighted average of IN/OUT) vs. radial distance from the center (instead of using x/y values shown in the TN), and then the average with it's uncertainty band, for the two target foils.
- Asymmetry vs Beam Position from Nominal (radially)
Request #3
Recreate Michael's Paper's Plot: Remaking of Figure 6: media:Au_targetMSteigerwald.gif. The lines are a fit ( asym = a / (1.0 + alpha . d) ). On the original figure, the lines were his calculations.
Request #4
We need an imagine of a typical FESEM picture showing a gold foil on a silicon substrate, or maybe 2 or 4 of them arranged to show typical measured you used in the analysis.
Request #5
For two foils, two samples were prepared – one near the foil center and one near the edge, and each were measured. Where are those results (or FESEM images) ?
Request #6
The detectors are centered at theta=172.6. We should check if S is maximum there or not. => The answer is that the maximum for KE=5MeV Au is 173.1 per Xavier and 129.9 per Ketevi. I think we erred perhaps so that the solid angle intercepted S at the same value left/right, or something like that.
- (Joe) Acceptance and Sherman Function media:160707_ShermancAcceptance.pptx