Difference between revisions of "Bubble Chamber Meeting Wednesday January 20, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
2- Sept beam test data analysis: [[media:Analyses_Rashi_Jan2016.pdf]] [[media:Analyses_Rashi_Jan2016.pptx]] | 2- Sept beam test data analysis: [[media:Analyses_Rashi_Jan2016.pdf]] [[media:Analyses_Rashi_Jan2016.pptx]] | ||
| − | 3 | + | 3- Discussion of June 2016 beam test |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 37: | Line 33: | ||
| − | * My previous statement [https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/Bubble_Chamber_Meeting_Wednesday_November_11,_2015] about beam energy being 5% lower than set value is not correct. Complete analysis of the beam energy measurements is forthcoming. | + | * My previous statement [https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/Bubble_Chamber_Meeting_Wednesday_November_11,_2015] about beam energy being 5% lower than set value is not correct. The quarter cryo-unit RF gradients were found to be lower by 5%. During the September test, we set the energy using the dipole so we should be very close to the quoted energy. Complete analysis of the beam energy measurements is forthcoming. |
| + | |||
| + | * In the simulation, the collimator inner radius is correct (8.0 mm). | ||
Revision as of 10:08, 21 January 2016
We will meet in TL 2221 on Wednesday January 20 at 3:30 pm EST.
For those calling in we'll use the Blue Jeans [1] audio conference system.
Phone number: 1-888-240-2560 Meeting ID: 3528502673# Meeting URL: http://bluejeans.com/3528502673
Agenda:
1- GEANT4 Simulation:
- Gamma Flux: media:G4Flux_Sept2015.pdf media:G4Flux_Sept2015.pptx
- Expected Rates:
- 18O(γ,α)14C with no ThrCut: media:O18ga_rate_G4.txt
- 17O(γ,n)16O with:
- ThrCut = 90 keV: media:O17gn_rate_G4_90keV.txt
- ThrCut = 130 keV: media:O17gn_rate_G4_130keV.txt
- 14N(γ,p)13C with:
- ThrCut = 20 keV: media:N14gp_rate_G4_20keV.txt
- ThrCut = 50 keV: media:N14gp_rate_G4_50keV.txt
2- Sept beam test data analysis: media:Analyses_Rashi_Jan2016.pdf media:Analyses_Rashi_Jan2016.pptx
3- Discussion of June 2016 beam test
Notes from this meeting:
- My previous statement [2] about beam energy being 5% lower than set value is not correct. The quarter cryo-unit RF gradients were found to be lower by 5%. During the September test, we set the energy using the dipole so we should be very close to the quoted energy. Complete analysis of the beam energy measurements is forthcoming.
- In the simulation, the collimator inner radius is correct (8.0 mm).