Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210415"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
=Reports=
 
=Reports=
 
==Hampton==
 
==Hampton==
===(15 + 10 min) Updates by B. Pandey===
+
 
 +
===(15 + 10 min) Angle resolution estimation by B. Pandey===
 
*
 
*
  

Revision as of 07:45, 12 April 2021

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

  • 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants: (Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Gudio, Franco, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, K. Okuyama, T. Akiyama, Y. Toyama)
  • via BlueJeans

Reports

Hampton

(15 + 10 min) Angle resolution estimation by B. Pandey

Kyoto

(15 + 10 min) Updates by K.N. Suzuki

Tohoku

(15 + 10 min) Updates by S. Nagao

(15 + 10 min) Updates by K. Itabashi

Homework from the last meeting

  1. Tuning test with Al peaks.
    • Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
      will be provided to Japanese group (→ Hampton)
      → It was found that the initial matrices that were used for the latest tuning were tuned matrices involved by four of Al peaks.
      Japanese group will test how the momentum tuning works.
    • Test of single peak inclusion of the Al data for the tuning
      → any other peaks grow? (→ Tohoku/Kyoto)

  2. Angle resolution. Definition of the angle needs to be checked at first (→ Hampton/Tohoku/Kyoto).
  3. How was the QF shape obtained in Bishnu's spectrum?
    → We want to see some typical figures by which the analysis procedure can be discussed quantitatively.
  4. H contamination
    → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region. (→ Hampton)




back to home