NnL analysis meeting-20210415
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
nnΛ Analysis Meeting
Information
- 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST)
- Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Gudio, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, Nathaniel, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, K. Okuyama, T. Akiyama, T. Fujiwara
- via BlueJeans
Reports
K. Okuyama
- Angle definitions
T. Gogami
JLabMeeting_20210415_gogami.pdf
- Comparison of angle resolutions by using two different descriptions of Hampton (Tohoku) and Kyoto
- Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks
K.N. Suzuki
- Angle resolutions
K. Itabashi
- Angle accuracy
B. Pandey
- Angle resolution
S. Nagao
- Expected spectrum from the Al target
Discussion
- Matrices that were involved four peaks of Al were used as initial matrices for the latest tuning (Hampton)
→ - Geant4 Simulation (HRS)
- Momentum resolution with the point particle generation will be evaluated (Suzuki (Kyoto)).
Homework from the last meeting
- Tuning test with Al peaks.
- Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
will be provided to Japanese group (→ Hampton)
→ It was found that the initial matrices that were used for the latest tuning were tuned matrices involved by four of Al peaks.
→Japanese group will test how the momentum tuning works. Test of single peak inclusion of the Al data for the tuning
→ any other peaks grow? (→ Tohoku/Kyoto)
- Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
- Angle resolution. Definition of the angle needs to be checked at first (→ Hampton/Tohoku/Kyoto).
- How was the QF shape obtained in Bishnu's spectrum?
→ We want to see some typical figures by which the analysis procedure can be discussed quantitatively. - H contamination
→ Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region. (→ Hampton)
- Previous Meeting (Mar 31, 2021)
- Back to home