Difference between revisions of "HYP Pb-exp 20231115"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<font size="4">[[Media:JLab meeting gogami 20231115.pdf|JLab_meeting_gogami_20231115.pdf]]</font> | <font size="4">[[Media:JLab meeting gogami 20231115.pdf|JLab_meeting_gogami_20231115.pdf]]</font> | ||
* The errors on s<sub>Λ</sub> are similar for 10-20μA and 20-40 days. | * The errors on s<sub>Λ</sub> are similar for 10-20μA and 20-40 days. | ||
| − | * Toshi's | + | * S/N assumed in the Toshi's simulation is worse than that of Guido. <br> → This could be because of π<sup>+</sup> and proton contamination <br> (Guido did not take into account π<sup>+</sup> and proton contamination in the simulation) |
* Let's quantitatively think about physics outcome from the excited states (p, d, f). | * Let's quantitatively think about physics outcome from the excited states (p, d, f). | ||
Latest revision as of 10:26, 16 November 2023
Pb target experiment (E12-20-013)
Infomation
- Time and date: 13:30-15:00 Nov 15, 2023 EST
- Participants: Franco, Guido, Nue, Toshi, Teppei
- Place: CC F324-325 (JLab)
Discussion
JLab_meeting_gogami_20231115.pdf
- The errors on sΛ are similar for 10-20μA and 20-40 days.
- S/N assumed in the Toshi's simulation is worse than that of Guido.
→ This could be because of π+ and proton contamination
(Guido did not take into account π+ and proton contamination in the simulation) - Let's quantitatively think about physics outcome from the excited states (p, d, f).