Difference between revisions of "Hyp-StraMeeting 20220203"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
** When ? <br> &rarr; Could be in 2026~ even in Hall C.   
 
** When ? <br> &rarr; Could be in 2026~ even in Hall C.   
 
** Moller 2024. SBS is being tried to be done before that. <br> &rarr; HKS would be in 2029~ in the case of Hall A.  
 
** Moller 2024. SBS is being tried to be done before that. <br> &rarr; HKS would be in 2029~ in the case of Hall A.  
 +
** HRS-HRS could be jumped in (in 2024? for example)?
 
** Can be longer ?  
 
** Can be longer ?  
  

Revision as of 08:46, 3 February 2022

Strategy Meeting

Info

  • 21:00- on Feb 03, 2022 (JST)
  • Franco, Mark, Nue, Liguang, Guido, Joerg, Pete, Sho, Gogami
  • via Zoom

Discussion (1)

  • Possibility of HKS in Hall C (c.f. Collaboration Meeting 2021)
    • Kinematics difference between Hall A and C.
      Larger energy in Hall A which leads to a better S/N, but worse resolution.
    • Three cases are being studied, A: PCS+HKS+SHMS, B: PCS+HKS+HES, C: SPL+HKS+HES.
      → Solid angle / momentum resolution were shown after Q strength were adjusted for the B and C option.
  • Beam time
    • When ?
      → Could be in 2026~ even in Hall C.
    • Moller 2024. SBS is being tried to be done before that.
      → HKS would be in 2029~ in the case of Hall A.
    • HRS-HRS could be jumped in (in 2024? for example)?
    • Can be longer ?
  • PAC

Report

  • Information to share
    • PCS status
    • Hall A / C simulation (Tohoku)


Discussion (2)

  • Paper draft (nnΛ)
  • Presentations in Hall A Winter Collaboration meeting
    • Toshi: nnΛ
    • Guido: HKS





Back to Home (Hypernuclear project with HRS-HKS)