Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20210611"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* Simulation spectrum for the Al data  
 
* Simulation spectrum for the Al data  
 
** The number of counts was estimated assuming the cross section if 100 nb/sr.  
 
** The number of counts was estimated assuming the cross section if 100 nb/sr.  
** Simulated spectrum was made with width assumptions of &sigma; = 0.5 and 1.0 MeV.  <br> He will check if the width assumptions are reasonable once the new A dependence was evaluated.
+
** Simulated spectrum was made with width assumptions of &sigma; = 0.5 and 1.0 MeV.  <br> He will check if the width assumptions are reasonable once the new A dependence is evaluated.
  
 
=Nathaniel=
 
=Nathaniel=

Revision as of 00:50, 11 June 2021

JLab Hypernuclear Meeting

Info

  • 9:30-10:30 on June 11, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants: Bishnu, Nathaniel, Toshi Gogami
  • via BlueJeans

Bishnu

  • About the angle resolution in the nnΛ experiment
    • Hole size + angle resolution
    • The angle resolution that he estimated will be used for the A dependence of the missing mass resolution.
  • Simulation spectrum for the Al data
    • The number of counts was estimated assuming the cross section if 100 nb/sr.
    • Simulated spectrum was made with width assumptions of σ = 0.5 and 1.0 MeV.
      He will check if the width assumptions are reasonable once the new A dependence is evaluated.

Nathaniel

PDF1, PDF2, PDF3

  • Energy loss correction, Multiple scattering effect in target

Next Meeeting

  • 8:30- p.m. on June 25, 2021 (EDT)
  • 9:30- a.m. on June 24, 2021 (JST)





Back to Home