Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis 20210611"

From Tritium Experiments Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
=Info=
 
=Info=
* 9:30-10:30 on June 11, 2021 (JST)
+
* 9:30-10:30 a.m. on June 11, 2021 (JST)
 
* Participants: Bishnu, Nathaniel, Toshi Gogami
 
* Participants: Bishnu, Nathaniel, Toshi Gogami
 
* via BlueJeans
 
* via BlueJeans
  
 
=Bishnu=
 
=Bishnu=
* About the angle resolution
+
* About the angle resolution in the nnΛ experiment
 
** Hole size + angle resolution  
 
** Hole size + angle resolution  
** The angle resolution that he estimated will be used for the A dependence of the missing mass resolution.  
+
** The angle resolution that he estimated will be used for the A dependence of the missing mass resolution.
 +
 
 +
* Simulation spectrum for the Al data
 +
** The number of counts was estimated assuming the cross section if 100 nb/sr.
 +
** Simulated spectrum was made with width assumptions of &sigma; = 0.5 and 1.0 MeV.  <br> He will check if the width assumptions are reasonable once the new A dependence is evaluated.
  
 
=Nathaniel=
 
=Nathaniel=
Line 18: Line 22:
 
</font>
 
</font>
 
* Energy loss correction, Multiple scattering effect in target
 
* Energy loss correction, Multiple scattering effect in target
 +
** Multiple scattering with lower momentum is different. <br> He is going to check if the difference is reasonable by estimating it by hand calculation.
 +
** Energy loss MPV as a function of x' was obtained in TARG simulation. <br> &rarr; The width became about &sigma; = 100 keV from 200 keV for the particles from the main body of the cell.
  
 
=Next Meeeting=
 
=Next Meeeting=
* 8:30- p.m. on June 25, 2021 (EDT)
+
* 8:30- p.m. on June 24, 2021 (EDT)
* 9:30- a.m. on June 24, 2021 (JST)
+
* 9:30- a.m. on June 25, 2021 (JST)
  
  

Latest revision as of 01:40, 11 June 2021

JLab Hypernuclear Meeting

Info

  • 9:30-10:30 a.m. on June 11, 2021 (JST)
  • Participants: Bishnu, Nathaniel, Toshi Gogami
  • via BlueJeans

Bishnu

  • About the angle resolution in the nnΛ experiment
    • Hole size + angle resolution
    • The angle resolution that he estimated will be used for the A dependence of the missing mass resolution.
  • Simulation spectrum for the Al data
    • The number of counts was estimated assuming the cross section if 100 nb/sr.
    • Simulated spectrum was made with width assumptions of σ = 0.5 and 1.0 MeV.
      He will check if the width assumptions are reasonable once the new A dependence is evaluated.

Nathaniel

PDF1, PDF2, PDF3

  • Energy loss correction, Multiple scattering effect in target
    • Multiple scattering with lower momentum is different.
      He is going to check if the difference is reasonable by estimating it by hand calculation.
    • Energy loss MPV as a function of x' was obtained in TARG simulation.
      → The width became about σ = 100 keV from 200 keV for the particles from the main body of the cell.

Next Meeeting

  • 8:30- p.m. on June 24, 2021 (EDT)
  • 9:30- a.m. on June 25, 2021 (JST)





Back to Home