Difference between revisions of "Kerr - July 29, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
** [[media:preadj7.0mm.xlsx]] | ** [[media:preadj7.0mm.xlsx]] | ||
| − | --- adjustments made on linear stage in an attempt to gain parallel relation to foil, We moved legs of table to be parallel with solenoid. | + | --- '''adjustments made on linear stage in an attempt to gain parallel relation to foil, We moved legs of table to be parallel with solenoid.''' |
Note: Center at 12.8 mm | Note: Center at 12.8 mm | ||
* far right 17.3 mm (on micrometer) | * far right 17.3 mm (on micrometer) | ||
| − | ** [[media:farright17. | + | ** [[media:farright17.3mm.xlsx]] |
** This is not pretty^ | ** This is not pretty^ | ||
* right center at 15.4 mm (on Micrometer) | * right center at 15.4 mm (on Micrometer) | ||
** [[media:rightcenter15.4mm.xlsx]] | ** [[media:rightcenter15.4mm.xlsx]] | ||
| + | ** Also not pretty^ | ||
* at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) w/ lens... Note: I did not finish this measurement or foolishly did not save it... | * at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) w/ lens... Note: I did not finish this measurement or foolishly did not save it... | ||
| − | ** [[media:12. | + | ** [[media:12.8mmwlens.xlsx]] |
* at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) w/out lens... this was a test to see if the lens was the reason for the "dip"... As soon as we saw a dip we agreed the lens was not affecting signal therefore we didn't finish the measurement | * at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) w/out lens... this was a test to see if the lens was the reason for the "dip"... As soon as we saw a dip we agreed the lens was not affecting signal therefore we didn't finish the measurement | ||
| − | ** [[media:12. | + | ** [[media:12.8mmwoutlens.xlsx]] |
Latest revision as of 23:39, 29 July 2016
Magnetic Measurement Facility readings of pucks, Steel () and Molybdenum --> media:LDGT01 Puck Measurements for MOKE 16-7-28.xlsx
Important INFO to note
- foil surface diameter across is 11 mm +-.5 mm
- Laser dot diameter through polarizer to foil surface is 2mm +-.5 mm
Excel Sheets for MMF data taken
---First, Data taken with original setup. Stage untouched since the 28th. Before stage was realigned in an attempt to be parallel with foil
- two measurements were taken
- Center was approximately 10.75 mm (on micrometer)
- at 9.3 mm (on micrometer) a tad left of center
- at 7.0 mm (on micrometer)
--- adjustments made on linear stage in an attempt to gain parallel relation to foil, We moved legs of table to be parallel with solenoid.
Note: Center at 12.8 mm
- far right 17.3 mm (on micrometer)
- media:farright17.3mm.xlsx
- This is not pretty^
- right center at 15.4 mm (on Micrometer)
- media:rightcenter15.4mm.xlsx
- Also not pretty^
- at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) w/ lens... Note: I did not finish this measurement or foolishly did not save it...
- at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) w/out lens... this was a test to see if the lens was the reason for the "dip"... As soon as we saw a dip we agreed the lens was not affecting signal therefore we didn't finish the measurement
- With mirror in place of foil at center 12.8 mm
- 25 amp increments (as opposed to 50 amp inc.) at 12.8 mm (on micrometer)
- Stability check at 12.8 mm (on Micrometer) with constant I of 200 amps over span of 16 min