Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210415"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Information= | =Information= | ||
* 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST) | * 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST) | ||
| − | * Participants: | + | * Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Gudio, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, Nathaniel, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, K. Okuyama, T. Akiyama, T. Fujiwara |
* via BlueJeans | * via BlueJeans | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==T. Gogami== | ==T. Gogami== | ||
| − | [[Media:JLabMeeting 20210415 gogami.pdf| | + | <font size="4">[[Media:JLabMeeting 20210415 gogami.pdf|JLabMeeting_20210415_gogami.pdf]]</font> |
| + | * Comparison of angle resolutions by using two different descriptions of Hampton (Tohoku) and Kyoto | ||
* Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks | * Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
== B. Pandey== | == B. Pandey== | ||
| + | <font size="4">[[Media:April14 2021 Meeting.pdf|April14_2021_Bishnu.pdf]]</font> | ||
* Angle resolution | * Angle resolution | ||
==S. Nagao== | ==S. Nagao== | ||
| − | * Expected spectrum from Al target | + | * Expected spectrum from the Al target |
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
| − | * | + | * Matrices that were involved four peaks of Al were used as initial matrices for the latest tuning (Hampton)<br> → |
| − | * | + | * Geant4 Simulation (HRS) |
| − | * | + | ** Momentum resolution with the point particle generation will be evaluated (Suzuki (Kyoto)). |
=Homework from the last meeting= | =Homework from the last meeting= | ||
| Line 47: | Line 49: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
| − | <font size="4"> [[HYP_HRS-HKS| | + | * <font size="4">[[nnL_analysis_meeting-20210331| Previous Meeting]] (Mar 31, 2021) </font><br> |
| + | * <font size="4"> [[HYP_HRS-HKS|Back to home]]</font> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:39, 15 April 2021
nnΛ Analysis Meeting
Information
- 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST)
- Participants: Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Gudio, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, Nathaniel, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, K. Okuyama, T. Akiyama, T. Fujiwara
- via BlueJeans
Reports
K. Okuyama
- Angle definitions
T. Gogami
JLabMeeting_20210415_gogami.pdf
- Comparison of angle resolutions by using two different descriptions of Hampton (Tohoku) and Kyoto
- Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks
K.N. Suzuki
- Angle resolutions
K. Itabashi
- Angle accuracy
B. Pandey
- Angle resolution
S. Nagao
- Expected spectrum from the Al target
Discussion
- Matrices that were involved four peaks of Al were used as initial matrices for the latest tuning (Hampton)
→ - Geant4 Simulation (HRS)
- Momentum resolution with the point particle generation will be evaluated (Suzuki (Kyoto)).
Homework from the last meeting
- Tuning test with Al peaks.
- Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
will be provided to Japanese group (→ Hampton)
→ It was found that the initial matrices that were used for the latest tuning were tuned matrices involved by four of Al peaks.
→Japanese group will test how the momentum tuning works. Test of single peak inclusion of the Al data for the tuning
→ any other peaks grow? (→ Tohoku/Kyoto)
- Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
- Angle resolution. Definition of the angle needs to be checked at first (→ Hampton/Tohoku/Kyoto).
- How was the QF shape obtained in Bishnu's spectrum?
→ We want to see some typical figures by which the analysis procedure can be discussed quantitatively. - H contamination
→ Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region. (→ Hampton)
- Previous Meeting (Mar 31, 2021)
- Back to home