Difference between revisions of "NnL analysis meeting-20210415"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==T. Gogami== | ==T. Gogami== | ||
+ | [[Media:JLabMeeting 20210415 gogami.pdf|PDF]] | ||
* Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks | * Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 14 April 2021
nnΛ Analysis Meeting
Information
- 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST)
- Participants: (Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Gudio, Franco, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, K. Okuyama, T. Akiyama, Y. Toyama)
- via BlueJeans
Reports
K. Okuyama
- Angle definitions
T. Gogami
- Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks
K.N. Suzuki
- Angle resolutions
K. Itabashi
- Angle accuracy
B. Pandey
- Angle resolution
S. Nagao
- Expected spectrum from Al target
Discussion
Homework from the last meeting
- Tuning test with Al peaks.
- Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
will be provided to Japanese group (→ Hampton)
→ It was found that the initial matrices that were used for the latest tuning were tuned matrices involved by four of Al peaks.
→Japanese group will test how the momentum tuning works. Test of single peak inclusion of the Al data for the tuning
→ any other peaks grow? (→ Tohoku/Kyoto)
- Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
- Angle resolution. Definition of the angle needs to be checked at first (→ Hampton/Tohoku/Kyoto).
- How was the QF shape obtained in Bishnu's spectrum?
→ We want to see some typical figures by which the analysis procedure can be discussed quantitatively. - H contamination
→ Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region. (→ Hampton)