NnL analysis meeting-20210415

nnΛ Analysis Meeting

Information

• 9:00- April 15, 2021 (JST)
• Participants: (Nue, Liguang, Pete, Joerg, Gudio, Franco, Toshi, Sho, Bishnu, K.N.Suzuki, K. Itabashi, K. Okuyama, T. Akiyama, Y. Toyama)
• via BlueJeans

Reports

K. Okuyama

• Angle definitions

T. Gogami

JLabMeeting_20210415_gogami.pdf

• Comments on angle resolutions by using two different descriptions of Hampton (Tohoku) and Kyoto
• Introduction to Suzuki's and Itabashi's talks

K.N. Suzuki

• Angle resolutions

K. Itabashi

• Angle accuracy

B. Pandey

• Angle resolution

S. Nagao

• Expected spectrum from Al target

Homework from the last meeting

1. Tuning test with Al peaks.
   
   • Information about the matrix tuning and matrices (which have not been involved Al tuning at all)
     will be provided to Japanese group (→ Hampton)
     → It was found that the initial matrices that were used for the latest tuning were tuned matrices involved by four of Al peaks.
     → Japanese group will test how the momentum tuning works.
   • Test of single peak inclusion of the Al data for the tuning
     → any other peaks grow? (→ Tohoku/Kyoto)
     
2. Angle resolution. Definition of the angle needs to be checked at first (→ Hampton/Tohoku/Kyoto).
3. How was the QF shape obtained in Bishnu's spectrum?
   → We want to see some typical figures by which the analysis procedure can be discussed quantitatively.
4. H contamination
   → Shape of Λ may be better to be asymmetry to discuss about the Σ bound region. (→ Hampton)

---

back to home