Difference between revisions of "Kerr - August 1, 2016"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Today we learned a lot. Measurements within Magnetic field are not ideal as we are unable to pinpoint the strength of the field with the Kerr Apparatus. The first measurement...")
 
 
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
'''Important Facts about OLD (closer to Solenoid) Setup'''
 
'''Important Facts about OLD (closer to Solenoid) Setup'''
1. Magnetic field at laser 450 Gauss -+50 Gauss
+
# Magnetic field at laser 450 -+25 Gauss
2. Magnetic Field at PEM .......
+
# Magnetic Field at PEM (z-axis) 1200  +-25 Gauss, (x-axis) 50 +-25 Gauss, (y-axis) negligible
 +
# Photodiode (z-axis) 600 Gauss +-25, (x-axis) 300 Gauss, (y-axis) 20 +-10 Gauss
 +
# ''Angle'' 38.6 -+ 2.4 degrees (between laser and Photodiode)
  
  
 
'''Important Facts about NEW (farther) Setup'''
 
'''Important Facts about NEW (farther) Setup'''
......
+
# Laser, (z-Axis) 30 +- 10 Gauss, (x-axis) 10 +- 5 Gauss, (y-axis) Negligible
 +
# PEM z-axis 50 +-10 Gauss, (x-axis) negligible, y-axis negligible
 +
# Photodiode (z-axis) 30 +-10 Gauss, z and y negligible
 +
# ''Angle'' 5.31 +- .45 degrees (between laser and photodiode)

Latest revision as of 08:49, 2 August 2016

Today we learned a lot. Measurements within Magnetic field are not ideal as we are unable to pinpoint the strength of the field with the Kerr Apparatus.

The first measurement led us to the conclusion that the system was still faulty

Next we fastened the steel puck tightly with the holding device

We created a new puck holding device and the Kerr signal followed a somewhat symmetrical path with only a .2 Volt (DC) decrease as opposed to a 2 Volt change in DC

We then moved the whole stage to a much farther distance from solenoid with smaller angle with a very clear signal

Seeing this signal, we measured a mirror with the same set up

Then the Molybdenum Puck, there was a large change in Voltage (DC) and a reversal of the sign of the slope making us suspect the puck to not be as fastened as the initial steel measurement. Not exactly sure how much I trust this measurement (may repeat it)

After the unexpected molybdenum behaviour, we measured the steel puck again to test the signal's repeatability


Important Facts about OLD (closer to Solenoid) Setup

  1. Magnetic field at laser 450 -+25 Gauss
  2. Magnetic Field at PEM (z-axis) 1200 +-25 Gauss, (x-axis) 50 +-25 Gauss, (y-axis) negligible
  3. Photodiode (z-axis) 600 Gauss +-25, (x-axis) 300 Gauss, (y-axis) 20 +-10 Gauss
  4. Angle 38.6 -+ 2.4 degrees (between laser and Photodiode)


Important Facts about NEW (farther) Setup

  1. Laser, (z-Axis) 30 +- 10 Gauss, (x-axis) 10 +- 5 Gauss, (y-axis) Negligible
  2. PEM z-axis 50 +-10 Gauss, (x-axis) negligible, y-axis negligible
  3. Photodiode (z-axis) 30 +-10 Gauss, z and y negligible
  4. Angle 5.31 +- .45 degrees (between laser and photodiode)