Difference between revisions of "Gabriel Palacios-Serrano"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| + | == HV insulator for 500 kV: == | ||
| + | ** Exploring the use of the receptacle and the sizes of the SF6 spool [[Media:HV_insulator-1st_month.pptx]] | ||
| + | |||
== Wien filter stuff: == | == Wien filter stuff: == | ||
Revision as of 07:36, 26 July 2021
HV insulator for 500 kV:
- Exploring the use of the receptacle and the sizes of the SF6 spool Media:HV_insulator-1st_month.pptx
Wien filter stuff:
12th International Particle Accelerator Conference - IPAC’21, May 24-28, 2021 https://www.ipac21.org/#
- Wien filter submitted after JLab internal review approval Media:Gabriel Palacios Wien filter Abstract IPAC21 FINAL.docx
- Poster slides Media:IPAC_2021_poster_slides_final_Gabriel_Palacios.pptx
Summary comparing GPT results with ideal E-field CST model compared to actual surveyed Vertical Wien assembly. The presentation also indicates the location in the O group drive of the various CST-generated E-field maps and GPT beam dynamics simulations. The Horizontal beam assembly electrode assembly is < 100 micron difference in pitch along the beam path. There was no need to generate a new field map.
Spline electrode GPT simulations
Asymmetric bias GPT simulations
Inter-plate gap GPT simulations
Optics of the Wien filter, final
Optics of the Wien filter, first try
Bolts and washers (metal and alumina sims).
Exploring the reduction on the inter-plate gap.
Double thickness mounting tab sims.
Wien filter 6: What do we need for the 200 kV Wien filter using the UITF one as a base?
Wien filter 4: What do we need for the 200 kV Wien filter using the UITF one as a base?
Wien filter 3: I measured the vacuum lab's Wien filter and checked what we can scavenge for the 40 kV feedthrough version.
Wien filter 2: Simulation results for the 40 kV feedthrough for Wien filter at UITF.
Wien filter 1: Simulation results for the existing (05/22/2019) Wien filter at UITF.
Solidworks sumary
Data taking runs
UITF T-cathode electrode vs Small Shield: BPM data and centering in first lens at 200 [kV]
- Rev5 Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV-8.pptx
- Rev4 Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV-7.pptx
- Rev3 Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV-6.pptx
- Rev2 Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV-5.pptx
- Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV-4.pptx
- Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV-3.pptx
- Media:UITF_T-cathode_electrode_BPM_data_200_kV.pptx
Log entry related to how the Laser XY stage moves along the X-axis
Images of on axis QE run p2_2019-06-04_15_39 to calculate STEP-mm conversion factor
Ey difference for T-cathode and Small shield (From CST field maps)
GPT, CST, COMSOL
CST particle tracking of T-cathode, Small Shield and Big Shield @-200 kV
CORRECTION: CST and GPT info for the T-shape, mushroom, small mushroom, sphere small anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters.
GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -300 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. Impact of GBacc on emittance.
GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -300 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. Impact of field map interpolation step-size on emittance.
GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. We are trying to find out why is the measurements and simulated emittance so different.
THIS FILE HAS BEEN CORRECTED: CST and GPT info for the T-shape, mushroom, small mushroom, sphere small anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters.
Preliminary GPT results for the T-cathode vs Mushroom vs Sphere at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters. This is the same as the previous entry but shows extra slides with comparisons of the three cathodes wth one metric as requested by Matt.
Preliminary GPT results for the T-cathode vs Mushroom vs Sphere at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters.
Preliminary GPT results for the T-cathode vs Mushroom vs Sphere at -200 kV.
Test shields 1 to 7 simulations on CST for the -200 kV new CEBAF gun (and includes a bit of the GTS gun field maps at 200 kV w/small anode).
Test shields 1,2,3 & 4 simulations on CST for the -200 kV new CEBAF gun.
- Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1.pdf Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1.pptx
- Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1_w-noshield.pdf Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1_w-noshield.pptx
Field maps for the -200 kV new CEBAF gun @-130 kV and -180 kV.
Results for CST microwave studio simulations of the -300 kV GTS gun.
Corrections on the simulation results for the -200 kV CEBAF gun paper.
Document with details on the Pierce geometry angle variations for the -300 kV GTS gun.
COMSOL simulations for 300kV and 200kV guns upper shields
COMSOL modeling comparing CEBAF 130kV white insulator no shed versus Upgrade 200kV black insulator with shed. (Both guns biased at -200kV)